Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's just so unnecessary. Developers are going to have to built their apps to wrap content around the same size area as the notch, this doesn't really fix anything. Maybe you'll get 10 more viewable pixels for videos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KurtWilde
How does it not give more screen real estate? Maybe it's not where you'd like the screen real estate but it's definitely more overall screen.
Because developers will still have to build their apps around the same size area as the notch. If they just combined the pill shape and hole punch cutout, they could've moved them closer together, and shrunk the notch. But they decided to do this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KurtWilde
I predict when this is released the notch lovers will change course in their preference. Neither are great but the pill seems like it will feel way more immersive and content will flow around it vs losing context on a huge chunk of a video or game etc.

Oh geez, who am I kidding? People be stubborn.
 
I have a feeling they won’t bring back the battery percentage because there’s not much more space horizontally. And I’m a bit worried that the pill seems to go deeper in terms of vertical space than the current notch, which reminds me of the Pixel 3.

I hope I’m wrong though!
There appears to be quite a bit more space horizontally with the pill, partially because of the decreased bezel size. Also, there appears to be a bit more space vertically, again because of the decreased bezel size, but with the bottom of the pill at a similar location as the bottom of the notch, along with the pill being shorter than the notch, resulting in empty space above the pill.

The change in bezel size also accounts for the difference in aspect ratio.
Not sure how the pill shape is better. The portion of display above the pill does not look usable.
The space above and around the notch will likely be usable for video. It will not be part of the application safe space though.

In other words, for all intents and purposes, it will likely be treated similarly to the notch for applications.
 
Last edited:
Because developers will still have to build their apps around the same size area as the notch. If they just combined the pill shape and hole punch cutout, they could've moved them closer together, and shrunk the notch. But they decided to do this.

This creates more work for developers it doesn't negate the fact that the pill design = more screen real estate. More screen real estate is more screen real estate. Plain and simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fooobar
There appears to be quite a bit more space horizontally with the pill, partially because of the decreased bezel size. Also, there appears to be a bit more space vertically, again because of the decreased bezel size, but with the bottom of the pill at a similar location as the bottom of the notch, along with the pill being shorter than the notch, resulting in empty space above the pill.

The change in bezel size also accounts for the difference in aspect ratio.


The space above and around the notch will likely be usable for video. It will not be part of the application safe space though.

In other words, for all intents and purposes, it will likely be treated similarly to the notch for applications.
Horizontal space is difficult to tell, but vertical space is definitely more. Take a look at this:
 

Attachments

  • 6D1FF322-E9D1-4AC8-B7E0-5B43BB1D5CD3.jpeg
    6D1FF322-E9D1-4AC8-B7E0-5B43BB1D5CD3.jpeg
    362.5 KB · Views: 111
i like the cutouts better that the notch. But reality is we might not gain any usable space for it. Therefore it does not really matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GalileoSeven
It's just so unnecessary. Developers are going to have to built their apps to wrap content around the same size area as the notch, this doesn't really fix anything. Maybe you'll get 10 more viewable pixels for videos.

How dare Apple make developers do more work. Why don't we just cancel all innovation to make things easy for developers going forward?
 
This is almost certainly fake.

Just zoom in and you'll observe that around the notch and the pill/camera hole, there is a suspicious amount of image pixelation. The only other area of the image where this appears is where the poster has added the product labels above the alleged display glass.

I suspect this shot was heavily edited/doctored and is nothing more than fake news designed to capitalise on existing rumours.

Screenshot 2022-04-28 at 17.53.56.png
 
Maybe this is a stupid observation, but the pill, while taking up perhaps less screen real estate, seems to still be as equally "in the way"?
Its hard to tell for sure, but it actually looks like it drops lower than the notch, taking up more usable screen real estate, unless Apple has the area above the pill planned for something useful.
 
Last edited:
Horizontal space is difficult to tell, but vertical space is definitely more. Take a look at this:
Three things.

1. We don't even know if those pictures are real. However, if they are:
2. In that image, the pill screen is a mm or two lower than the notched screen. They're not aligned at the same height.
3. You didn't take account what I said about the bezels and pill height. The bezels of the Pros are smaller, so there is more vertical height to begin with. The pill is also shorter than the notch. Thus, if the bottom of the pill were the same level as the bottom of the notch, there would be unused space above the pill because the pill is shorter and the bezel above it is also shorter.
 
Three things.

1. We don't even know if those pictures are real. However, if they are:
2. In that image, the pill screen is a mm or two lower than the notched screen. They're not aligned at the same height.
3. You didn't take account what I said about the bezels and pill height. The bezels of the Pros are smaller, so there is more vertical height to begin with. The pill is also shorter than the notch. Thus, if the bottom of the pill were the same level as the bottom of the notch, there would be unused space above the pill because the pill is shorter and the bezel above it is also shorter.
I understand that the bezels are smaller, however, the point that I’m trying to make is that the bottom of the pill dives deeper into the screen, regardless of it having space in-between the bezel and the bezels being smaller. This means that, in a way, it will get in the way a bit more than the current notch. And this is clearly visible from the bad mock-up I made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aylk and Marie.D
Not sure how the pill shape is better. The portion of display above the pill does not look usable.

Who really uses the top of a display ever? The point is to make videos, games content more immersive. flowing around the pill vs being chunked out by a notch.

How am I the only one getting this?

If the notched iPhone never existed or you asked a person who's never seen it at least 80% of people would prefer the pill design when presented with both.
 
I understand that the bezels are smaller, however, the point that I’m trying to make is that the bottom of the pill dives deeper into the screen, regardless of it having space in-between the bezel and the bezels being smaller. This means that, in a way, it will get in the way a bit more than the current notch. And this is clearly visible from the bad mock-up I made.
Again, the screens in that picture aren't aligned. The pill screen is actually placed on the table lower than the notched screen.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: aylk
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
OSZAR »