Ok, since no one else will say it, I will. I don't need a phone with a battery so small it has to be charged twice per day.
Lightning doesn’t have enough pins to do 4k@60Hz DisplayPort, Thunderbolt or even full USB 3. It was at the end of its life anyway. It may be OK for the target users of the iPhone Air - but not for iPad Pros or top-end iPhones targeted at media creation, and ending up with different connectors across the iDevice range (not to mention Macs) would be stupid.USB-C is nice but flimsy in my experience, I always preferred the lightning connector, thinner, more secure and foolproof, they should have stuck with it, way easier to accommodate on a this design, 'F' the EU
Apple Designed USB-C as well. 18 out of the 79 USB C engineers and designers were from Apple.Apple caused usb c. They could have allowed licensing of lightning to other manufacturers or just let anyone use it many companies would have quickly jumped on board and it would have become standard.
But no. Apple help it as proprietary.
He would also drop the speaker.If Steve Jobs was alive there would be no port and it would be even thinner.
It isn't. They could have done that if they wanted too.EU regulation is the answer to why.
My XR had an off center Lightning port so...USB-C is nice but flimsy in my experience, I always preferred the lightning connector, thinner, more secure and foolproof, they should have stuck with it, way easier to accommodate on a this design, 'F' the EU
As someone that works an office job, which I think a lot do, I have access to a charger 24/7. Phones charge so fast these days that it only takes a few minutes to get enough juice if you are using a wall connector. That or just charge in my car on my commute. Personally, this is the ideal phone for me: good size, light weight, 120hz (rumored). The only thing pushing me towards a pro iphone now is 120hz. All I see is judder with 60hz scrolling now that I have adjusted to a higher refresh rate.
Meanwhile, the battery is near 50% by the time you board a flight, praying that it'll last all the way to the hotel.
Then why wouldn't you buy an iPhone with a larger battery?Ok, since no one else will say it, I will. I don't need a phone with a battery so small it has to be charged twice per day.
No, nobody would have jumped on that bandwagon. No major player would have wanted to be part of an ecosystem that is fully in Apples control where Apple demands you to produce products to their specifications. Apple would probably not have wanted that in the first place either.Apple caused usb c. They could have allowed licensing of lightning to other manufacturers or just let anyone use it many companies would have quickly jumped on board and it would have become standard.
But no. Apple help it as proprietary.
Only amateurs travel without a small power bank in their bag; even a 10K MagSafe is enough for most flights, and you can usually charge with a cable while on the plane. I see people clustered around the charging stations at their gate and I chuckle.Meanwhile, the battery is near 50% by the time you board a flight, praying that it'll last all the way to the hotel.
Only amateurs travel without a 10k power bank in their bag. I see people clustered around the charging stations at their gate and I chuckle.
Oppo Fold is already at 4.21mm when open, so I feel like Apple should match that with a phone that will launch almost 2 years after Oppo launched theirs.Foreshadowing for a foldable iPhone that will be either thinner or the same thickness as the current nonfoldables.
Impressive but it will be all about that screen and hopefully lack of crease.
Good thing planes have outlets...
Do I really have to count every part of a trip that doesn't allow charing while travelling?