Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I cant see them stretching the camera bump across the whole back, no one looks at that and goes oh that looks good especially rounded
 
Ok, since no one else will say it, I will. I don't need a phone with a battery so small it has to be charged twice per day.

As someone that works an office job, which I think a lot do, I have access to a charger 24/7. Phones charge so fast these days that it only takes a few minutes to get enough juice if you are using a wall connector. That or just charge in my car on my commute. Personally, this is the ideal phone for me: good size, light weight, 120hz (rumored). The only thing pushing me towards a pro iphone now is 120hz. All I see is judder with 60hz scrolling now that I have adjusted to a higher refresh rate.
 
USB-C is nice but flimsy in my experience, I always preferred the lightning connector, thinner, more secure and foolproof, they should have stuck with it, way easier to accommodate on a this design, 'F' the EU
Lightning doesn’t have enough pins to do 4k@60Hz DisplayPort, Thunderbolt or even full USB 3. It was at the end of its life anyway. It may be OK for the target users of the iPhone Air - but not for iPad Pros or top-end iPhones targeted at media creation, and ending up with different connectors across the iDevice range (not to mention Macs) would be stupid.

The Lightning plug might be thin but the socket has to have space for contacts above or below the plug, whereas USB-C keeps everything inside the shield of the plug. Any hypothetical Lightning 2 would need a true double-sided connector for the extra pins, so the socket would need contacts above and below the plug - so there’s no guarantee that the Lightning socket would take up less space than USB C. Then there’s the question of whether you can fit 2-3 times as many wires inside a Lightning plug without making it any thicker (and breaking backward compatibility).

The EU didn’t design USB-C - it was the USB-IF of which Apple is an influential member. Apple engineers played a major role in designing USB-C. Apple enthusiastically pushed USB-C (arguably, prematurely) on the Mac. If it was technically possible to make the new USB-C connector backwards-compatible with Lightning then Apple had every opportunity to make that happen.
 
Apple caused usb c. They could have allowed licensing of lightning to other manufacturers or just let anyone use it many companies would have quickly jumped on board and it would have become standard.

But no. Apple help it as proprietary.
Apple Designed USB-C as well. 18 out of the 79 USB C engineers and designers were from Apple.
 
As someone that works an office job, which I think a lot do, I have access to a charger 24/7. Phones charge so fast these days that it only takes a few minutes to get enough juice if you are using a wall connector. That or just charge in my car on my commute. Personally, this is the ideal phone for me: good size, light weight, 120hz (rumored). The only thing pushing me towards a pro iphone now is 120hz. All I see is judder with 60hz scrolling now that I have adjusted to a higher refresh rate.

Meanwhile, the battery is near 50% by the time you board a flight, praying that it'll last all the way to the hotel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HighwaySnowman
Apple caused usb c. They could have allowed licensing of lightning to other manufacturers or just let anyone use it many companies would have quickly jumped on board and it would have become standard.

But no. Apple help it as proprietary.
No, nobody would have jumped on that bandwagon. No major player would have wanted to be part of an ecosystem that is fully in Apples control where Apple demands you to produce products to their specifications. Apple would probably not have wanted that in the first place either.

Not to mention that such a move would have put pressure on Apple to actually develop Lightning further which in its turn would probably have resulted in a connector that is much larger than the Lightning that we know so it could accommodate the massive power and data requirements that USB-C supports today. People seem to be a bit quick to forget that Lightning was an outdated spec even when USB-C launched, never mind now nearly 10 years later.
 
Meanwhile, the battery is near 50% by the time you board a flight, praying that it'll last all the way to the hotel.
Only amateurs travel without a small power bank in their bag; even a 10K MagSafe is enough for most flights, and you can usually charge with a cable while on the plane. I see people clustered around the charging stations at their gate and I chuckle.
 
Foreshadowing for a foldable iPhone that will be either thinner or the same thickness as the current nonfoldables.

Impressive but it will be all about that screen and hopefully lack of crease.
Oppo Fold is already at 4.21mm when open, so I feel like Apple should match that with a phone that will launch almost 2 years after Oppo launched theirs.
 

Attachments

  • 005NAuPugy1hxqapsuog0j3332222npe__1_.jpg.jpeg
    005NAuPugy1hxqapsuog0j3332222npe__1_.jpg.jpeg
    44.1 KB · Views: 11
Do I really have to count every part of a trip that doesn't allow charing while travelling?

I think you are actually making my point for me haha. Outlets/chargers are everywhere. Hell even ubers! Generally the places where I don't have access to power, I am not on my phone. It's like people complaining about the apple watch battery life. Can you not throw it on a charger either when you sleep or if you sleep track when you first wake up?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
OSZAR »