Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Because big bosses at Apple sit there and brainstorm stuff like scanning your library and running IA on your face id map to figure out whether you have autism (supposedly).

Don't they have better things to do? This is what Apple considers relevant these days

Then simply don't opt in for the autism check should that come to being.

"Don't they have better things to do?"

It's called research. You may not be aware of what that's about.
 
So you don't see anything weird about Apple thinking it's their duty to find whether your child has autism. Because, why not?
No, they’re potentially providing a optional tool to help YOU determine if your child has autism, and then seek a professional opinion/diagnosis.

Society is really weird at the moment - people are fearful about trivial things yet fearless in the face of actual danger.
 
No, they’re potentially providing a tool to help YOU determine if your child has autism, and then seek a professional opinion/diagnosis.

Society is really weird at the moment - people are fearful & paranoid about trivial things yet fearless in the face of actual dangers.
So you don't see anything weird about Apple, a consumer electronics company, considering diagnosing Autism their business, by using the biometric sensors they implemented to unlock their devices?

The big question is, what do they care?
 
Maybe they should also detect this…

CDC64A25-E216-4147-AAEE-702768AE8F08.jpeg


Far bigger issue in the Apple community when compared to autism.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: WaffleBoi_15
Apple needs to let users decide what to do with all of those sensors and all of that computing power before they scare all of us away. (Fairly sure I've already bought my last iPhone. Too much, Apple. Far too much.).

Simply return it if it was an iPhone 13 purchase and find happiness.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: WaffleBoi_15
So you don't see anything weird about Apple, a consumer electronics company, considering diagnosing Autism their business?
Nope. What if a third party developer decided to produce an app with the same functionality & purpose? Is that more acceptable and if so, why? You choose to use it or not either way. I think this research is interesting and provided it’s all on-device & private, I don’t give a hoot what my device is capable of doing.
 
Then simply don't opt in for the autism check should that come to being.

"Don't they have better things to do?"

It's called research. You may not be aware of what that's about.
So I can op out? Apple will rollout an iOS Version expecially for me without the scanning code included?

The only way to opt out is NOT to buy Apple devices. If that`s what they aim for, you are welcome.
 
Nope. What if a third party developer decided to produce an app with the same functionality & purpose? Is that more acceptable and if so, why? You choose to use it or not either way. I think this research is interesting and provided it’s all on-device & private, I don’t give a hoot what my device is capable of doing.
Ah ok, if you find it normal there is nothing I can possibly say.

But as you can see, many of us don't. I just want a smartphone, not an electronic parent of a sort.
 
So I can op out? Apple will rollout an iOS Version expecially for me without the scanning code included?

The only way to opt out is NOT to buy Apple devices. If that`s what they aim for, you are welcome.

Yes, you may not be aware that yes, you can opt out or in with respect to many health/diagnostics/etc. aspects of iOS and MacOS.

I'm surprised you didn't know that.
 
Last edited:
If we are to believe the rumor, somebody had to decide it. Why do you change the subject so stubbornly? Do you work for Apple or are you a shareholder?

Changing the subject? We're talking about the rumor regarding the research Apple is apparently conducting with respect to autism detection, right? Or are you thinking it's about the Apple Car?
 
There are some things you shouldn’t do, no matter how noble or innocent your intentions are, because from the outside it looks just plain weird or suspicious. Street smarts are a real thing and I think Apple’s social justice and other crusades blind them from common sense and reading the room.

It’s not always about being brave and thinking different, especially when your ideas just don’t sit well with people, and I don’t mean stubborn haters.

But hey, what do I know?
It seems to me you know a lot.
 
Yes, you may not be aware that yes, you can opt out or in with respect to many health/diagnostic/etc. aspects iOS and MacOS.

I'm surprised you didn't know that.
I am totally aware of that, but please read my post again and you will understand.

I want an OS WITHOUT this kind of code included in the software. I don't care if can "opt out" somehow, which may work or not ...
 
Changing the subject? We're talking about the rumor regarding the research Apple is apparently conducting with respect to autism detection, right? Or are you thinking it's about the Apple Car?
Apple hasn't stated anything nor published a white paper.

"According to anonymous people" is a rumor, to my mind.
 
I am totally aware of that, but please read my post again and you will understand.

I want an OS WITHOUT this kind of code included in the software. I don't care if can "opt out" somehow, which may work or not ...
And I wanted a pony, but had to settle for a bicycle.

Write Tim Cook and give him a piece of your mind. Will you do it?
 
Apple hasn't stated anything nor published a white paper.

"According to anonymous people" is a rumor, to my mind.

Yes, absolutely. Which is why I used the qualifier apparently in one post and rumor in another (post# 49).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
OSZAR »