Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That they'd piss away the most valuable product and brand in the world to save a few bucks?

If you think the above, we must not be paying attention to the same company.

Apple may not be the innovative company they once were, but they are meticulous when it comes to HW.

Did you own the iPhone 11 with the infamous Intel modems? I did. Apple not only cut corners to save themselves a buck, but did so using a known-inferior product with documented issues capturing and holding a signal.

Guess who's modem team + technology Apple bought to develop their own modem chips? Fool us once.

Apple's modem efforts may be fine. Time will tell. They've had years and years to try and get it right and I think it's actually a good sign that it's taken them so long. But I'm never going to blind-faith trust Apple to not act in their own best interest first and cut the corners they want to cut versus the ones I would cut.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672 and Chuckeee
I don't think I would be able to use more than a 100MB/sec for anything even if tried REALLY hard

The point is not speed, any more so than GeekBench scores from an M4 MacBook Pro are the be-all/end-all of the M4's capabilities. It's about what available bandwidth allows in terms of concurrent connections, the ability for an individual tower to make full use of its backhaul connections. 5G also (can) offer significantly improved latency and range which makes it more suitable for full-time use or use as an alternative to a traditional wired connection. All of of which requires a modem that can properly take advantage of these improvements.
 
Low end?
I wonder why?
For lower performance expectations?
Probably, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it won’t be better than Qualcomm. Keep in mind, when they introduced Apple Silicon they started with M1 for base Macs, and that still blew Intel out of the water.

And the latest rumor is that pro cellular models will have a different Apple-designed modem. I don’t think Apple would go ahead with this change if the end result was inferior to Qualcomm. That would do too much damage to their image.
 
Considering how valuable the iPhone is to Apple and how meticulous Tim Cook is, does anyone actually think that Apple hasn't done very extensive testing on this modem?

That they'd piss away the most valuable product and brand in the world to save a few bucks?

If you think the above, we must not be paying attention to the same company.

Apple may not be the innovative company they once were, but they are meticulous when it comes to HW.
They may even have 2 models of the phone, one with the Qualcomm modem and another with the Apple one. That way, if there is an issue, they can just cut production of the Apple variant. I'm pretty sure that's how they did it for the iPhone 8.
 
Lower volume devices - makes sense to test first release on those, learn from the units in the wild, before adding them to higher volume products.
I strongly doubt that the iPhone SE is a low volume device. It is more likely this 1st gen modem is being deployed on devices where a reduced level of performance could be tolerated.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: KeithBN
So apple is testing his own thing on the "poor" peoples devices
On the devices that sell in low volumes.

Besides, the main areas where these modems might not match Qualcomm on in special features like mmWave and overall top performance. Areas where non-top tier devices would not be expected to have top-tier performance anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN
They may even have 2 models of the phone, one with the Qualcomm modem and another with the Apple one. That way, if there is an issue, they can just cut production of the Apple variant. I'm pretty sure that's how they did it for the iPhone 8.

Back then, Apple had only 3 iPhone models on the market: 8/Plus and X.

This time, they have 5 models. Double that for the SIM vs. eSIM models.

Apple won't duplicate the models. And back in 2017, it was because the Intel baseband didn't support CDMA, not because of redundancy.
 
I strongly doubt that the iPhone SE is a low volume device. It is more likely this 1st gen modem is being deployed on devices where a reduced level of performance could be tolerated.

The SE is 5-6% based on historical data. The 17 Slim isn't going to sell much more either.

1733518023824.png
 
We all know this will be a Apple Designed Modem but still paying Qualcomm royalty fees behind the scenes 😁
5G patent scene is a big mess. Everyone pays multiple players. Heck even Qualcomm pays license fee to others. What this will do is gives Apple a place on the negotiating table from position of strength. And this is more helpful for future when they invest in next standard 6G, 10 G or what ever they call. More patents and technology Apple has, it may cross license at good price for Qualcomm patents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN
With the expected upcoming tariffs I think the new SE will do a lot better than in the past.

I think many people are underestimating the persuasive ability of Tim Cook and Apple's ability to lobby. He got exemptions last time for virtually all Apple products.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Chuckeee
Considering how valuable the iPhone is to Apple and how meticulous Tim Cook is, does anyone actually think that Apple hasn't done very extensive testing on this modem?

That they'd piss away the most valuable product and brand in the world to save a few bucks?

If you think the above, we must not be paying attention to the same company.

Apple may not be the innovative company they once were, but they are meticulous when it comes to HW.
Apple does not extensively test anything any more. Just today I was working in Xcode and it refuses to spellcheck git commit messages. If Apple cannot get spell check (which has been around for what 30 years) to work what makes anyone think Apple is going to get something as complicated as an RF modem to work first time out of the box?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
I am very curious to see how their modems perform. I also am curious to see how long it will take before their modem is in the Pro phones, if ever.
Remember last time they used Intel modems, all of the Qualcomm modems were dumbed down so they did not make the Intel modems look bad. Expect the same fake specs again.
 
They still have to pay Qualcomm a license. It's impossible to make a modern 5G cellular modem without infringing Qualcomm's patents.

The difference is negotiating posture. When Qualcomm is the supplier, you have to pay them whatever they ask because they have you by the balls on the supply-side and on the IP side. With a viable alternative on the supply side, there is room for negotiation.

In case you don't realise everything I said there are wrong and are constantly repeated by MR comments.
 
They still have to pay Qualcomm a license. It's impossible to make a modern 5G cellular modem without infringing Qualcomm's patents.

The difference is negotiating posture. When Qualcomm is the supplier, you have to pay them whatever they ask because they have you by the balls on the supply-side and on the IP side. With a viable alternative on the supply side, there is room for negotiation.
I look forward to the day when Apple will be able to have their own fully in-house design and not need to pay Qualcomm a cent more, if it ever comes.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: cateye
Trying it out with a low volume product may be the right way to go. But I would prefer not to buy the first gen versions of these immediately after launch. Hopefully there will not be an issues. I had huge battery drain issues with my 12 Pro Max when Apple introduced 5G on the iPhones for the first time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
Where I live I have no phone signal at all. So for me I don't care if they don't put any modem in it. Although now that I am writing this...why do I even have a phone..🧐
 
  • Haha
Reactions: JPack
Apple does not extensively test anything any more. Just today I was working in Xcode and it refuses to spellcheck git commit messages. If Apple cannot get spell check (which has been around for what 30 years) to work what makes anyone think Apple is going to get something as complicated as an RF modem to work first time out of the box?

You're conflating software bugs with hardware failures. If you think they're the same thing, I don't think we have much to discuss 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Did you own the iPhone 11 with the infamous Intel modems? I did. Apple not only cut corners to save themselves a buck, but did so using a known-inferior product with documented issues capturing and holding a signal.

Guess who's modem team + technology Apple bought to develop their own modem chips? Fool us once.

Apple's modem efforts may be fine. Time will tell. They've had years and years to try and get it right and I think it's actually a good sign that it's taken them so long. But I'm never going to blind-faith trust Apple to not act in their own best interest first and cut the corners they want to cut versus the ones I would cut.

Mistakes happen, and will happen again.

But make no mistake that it's in APPLE'S best interest to make sure their new modem performs well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
OSZAR »