Apple is falling behind ... Nvidia, xAI, Tesla, Qualcomm about to mogg Apple.
That they'd piss away the most valuable product and brand in the world to save a few bucks?
If you think the above, we must not be paying attention to the same company.
Apple may not be the innovative company they once were, but they are meticulous when it comes to HW.
I don't think I would be able to use more than a 100MB/sec for anything even if tried REALLY hard
Probably, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it won’t be better than Qualcomm. Keep in mind, when they introduced Apple Silicon they started with M1 for base Macs, and that still blew Intel out of the water.Low end?
I wonder why?
For lower performance expectations?
Well, app updates and podcast downloads, for starters.Apart from speed test results, what exactly do you need 1600 MB/sec on a phone for? Genuinely curious.
I don't think I would be able to use more than a 100MB/sec for anything even if tried REALLY hard
They may even have 2 models of the phone, one with the Qualcomm modem and another with the Apple one. That way, if there is an issue, they can just cut production of the Apple variant. I'm pretty sure that's how they did it for the iPhone 8.Considering how valuable the iPhone is to Apple and how meticulous Tim Cook is, does anyone actually think that Apple hasn't done very extensive testing on this modem?
That they'd piss away the most valuable product and brand in the world to save a few bucks?
If you think the above, we must not be paying attention to the same company.
Apple may not be the innovative company they once were, but they are meticulous when it comes to HW.
I strongly doubt that the iPhone SE is a low volume device. It is more likely this 1st gen modem is being deployed on devices where a reduced level of performance could be tolerated.Lower volume devices - makes sense to test first release on those, learn from the units in the wild, before adding them to higher volume products.
On the devices that sell in low volumes.So apple is testing his own thing on the "poor" peoples devices
They may even have 2 models of the phone, one with the Qualcomm modem and another with the Apple one. That way, if there is an issue, they can just cut production of the Apple variant. I'm pretty sure that's how they did it for the iPhone 8.
SE and new 17 Air next year. Probably iPhone 18 regular model. Keep improving for two years and put High performance version in iPhone 19 Pro Max. Easily a. 3-4 year roll out.The SE is 5-6% based on historical data. The 17 Slim isn't going to sell much more either.
View attachment 2459583
5G patent scene is a big mess. Everyone pays multiple players. Heck even Qualcomm pays license fee to others. What this will do is gives Apple a place on the negotiating table from position of strength. And this is more helpful for future when they invest in next standard 6G, 10 G or what ever they call. More patents and technology Apple has, it may cross license at good price for Qualcomm patents.We all know this will be a Apple Designed Modem but still paying Qualcomm royalty fees behind the scenes 😁
With the expected upcoming tariffs I think the new SE will do a lot better than in the past.The SE is 5-6% based on historical data. The 17 Slim isn't going to sell much more either.
View attachment 2459583
With the expected upcoming tariffs I think the new SE will do a lot better than in the past.
Apple does not extensively test anything any more. Just today I was working in Xcode and it refuses to spellcheck git commit messages. If Apple cannot get spell check (which has been around for what 30 years) to work what makes anyone think Apple is going to get something as complicated as an RF modem to work first time out of the box?Considering how valuable the iPhone is to Apple and how meticulous Tim Cook is, does anyone actually think that Apple hasn't done very extensive testing on this modem?
That they'd piss away the most valuable product and brand in the world to save a few bucks?
If you think the above, we must not be paying attention to the same company.
Apple may not be the innovative company they once were, but they are meticulous when it comes to HW.
Remember last time they used Intel modems, all of the Qualcomm modems were dumbed down so they did not make the Intel modems look bad. Expect the same fake specs again.I am very curious to see how their modems perform. I also am curious to see how long it will take before their modem is in the Pro phones, if ever.
They still have to pay Qualcomm a license. It's impossible to make a modern 5G cellular modem without infringing Qualcomm's patents.
The difference is negotiating posture. When Qualcomm is the supplier, you have to pay them whatever they ask because they have you by the balls on the supply-side and on the IP side. With a viable alternative on the supply side, there is room for negotiation.
I look forward to the day when Apple will be able to have their own fully in-house design and not need to pay Qualcomm a cent more, if it ever comes.They still have to pay Qualcomm a license. It's impossible to make a modern 5G cellular modem without infringing Qualcomm's patents.
The difference is negotiating posture. When Qualcomm is the supplier, you have to pay them whatever they ask because they have you by the balls on the supply-side and on the IP side. With a viable alternative on the supply side, there is room for negotiation.
Apple does not extensively test anything any more. Just today I was working in Xcode and it refuses to spellcheck git commit messages. If Apple cannot get spell check (which has been around for what 30 years) to work what makes anyone think Apple is going to get something as complicated as an RF modem to work first time out of the box?
Well, app updates and podcast downloads, for starters.
Did you own the iPhone 11 with the infamous Intel modems? I did. Apple not only cut corners to save themselves a buck, but did so using a known-inferior product with documented issues capturing and holding a signal.
Guess who's modem team + technology Apple bought to develop their own modem chips? Fool us once.
Apple's modem efforts may be fine. Time will tell. They've had years and years to try and get it right and I think it's actually a good sign that it's taken them so long. But I'm never going to blind-faith trust Apple to not act in their own best interest first and cut the corners they want to cut versus the ones I would cut.