So why is interacting with your phone considered distracted driving, but interacting with these screens not?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
CarPlay Ultra Solves One of Regular CarPlay's Biggest Limitations
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Fair point.
But if I enter my destination I really would like to be informed of (bad) weather conditions, especially in the mountains. Tech is feasible, just like a road block ahead, or traffic jam.
CarPlay is such a boring interface. And with Ultra Apple is trying to wring value out of its failed car project. And after 2.0 failed to impress with manufacturers Apple has to walk it back and we have ultra. It's uninspired, I hope the new design language of iOS 19 make sits way to CarPlay to inject some much needed pizzazz
Cave Johnson with yet another horrible take. This is on brand.
Sure. I have no problem with adverse weather information. I was responding to someone wondering why you'd want to have the temperature displayed rather than current weather conditions (and, again, for current conditions, I can determine rain-or-not by looking out the windshield, but I can't determine the temperature within 5 degrees during that same look). If there's bad weather up ahead, it'd be nice to know. If there's something unusual (high surf advisory, high wind alerts, etc.), Carrot Weather forwards alerts from the National Weather Service (at least while we still have that), and for really bad conditions (hurricanes, flash flood watch, whatever), I'll likely get 37 alerts from the FEMA app.
I have no interest in any UI having "pizzazz".
just want to be able to do what I need to do as easily as possible
I get the impression that many of the people who keep saying Google Maps is better either haven't used it, or haven't used it since shortly after it was released (which was premature, occasioned by Google trying to negotiate for creepy levels of data about people, rather than just money). I've been very happy with Apple Maps, and on the occasions when I've had to go back to Google Maps (like when somebody sends a link), I've been dismayed at how crapped up the display is - like zoom out to a 5000ft view over a section of the city and the map is still shouting "and here's an important landmark to guide you, this random Thai restaurant 10 miles away that paid us to say it's important".
Do not give me "pizzazz", give me highly functional well-designed interfaces - a well-designed interface has an elegance all its own.
If you want shiny blinky things, go download some "free-to-play" microtransaction-based games.
I agree that I don’t want them to add “shiny blinky things”, but the CarPlay look IS quite dated, and needs a touch-up. Should still be as clean, just a little more “fresh”.
How does CarPlay’s interface get updated in the car? Is it wholly dependent upon the phone’s OS version, or is the base appearance pre-loaded by the car manufacturer into the infotainment unit, with the phone just controlling the existing interface and adding new app icons? IOW, to upgrade the car’s CarPlay interface, does the car’s infotainment software need to be updated too?
While $100k might not be an exact number (it was a joke) prices on all vehicles are absolutely going up as a result of the tariffs. CarPlay or no CarPlay. That’s just math. You can’t levy a huge tax on vehicles, and expect prices to remain the same. Even if the vehicle is 100% made in the us, and I’m pretty sure none are, the dealers will raise prices to increase profit margin when competing with imports who’s price absolutely will go up. I have a gm vehicle with CarPlay. I know it will never get this update, but it certainly would be a nice thing to have. I hate going into the stock software just to check the outside temp of the vehicle, or to tune the radio.
Well, yes, but wouldn't that app stream rather than using the car's satellite receiver?
The entire point of satellite radio is that it works anywhere you have a clear sky - no need for cellular coverage (not that I really think that's tremendously significant in the year of our lord 2025, but it is the way they market it).
This hits differently in places with scant cell service.
For what it's worth, if you know the call letters, you can get many stations by telling Siri to "play WFMU" (for instance) and it'll do just that. Works on HomePods too. I've been using an app called RadioApp, which has a very cool analog-style tuner interface that lets you skip around to streams in your local area (or anywhere, if you want).
It can be great to find a cool local radio station and listen to shows and get DJs who tell you more about what you're listening to.
Yeah, you're describing commercial radio and it is very ****ty. Not all radio stations are like that. Try an indie, or a college station. World of difference, and sometimes great LOCAL information.
Agree. But what IS useful in my car (and maybe yours) is the onboard thermometer that tells you the real temperature where your car actually is -- not at some random weather station. That becomes very useful information near the freezing mark so you know to watch for ice.
Last edited:
I know you and others are trying to be helpful by letting me know that the iPhone can pick up internet streamed simulcasts from many radio stations who offer that, but it really is completely missing the point of what I am actually saying
I am very deliberately saying that the iPhone should be able to receive AM/FM broadcasts. There are many reasons for this that go beyond simply wanting to hear whatever song is playing on KROQ at the moment
No, what you wrote was that "iPhones should get an AM/FM radio app". And then people responded with... how you can stream AM/FM radio on an app.
But what you apparently meant was that you want there to be an actual hardware tuner built into iPhone. Big difference!
And, for what it's worth, I agree that would be useful -- and important in some emergency situations. I can't find it right now but I remember reading an article specifically about how a lot of people (or even regulatory agencies? can't remember) were pushing for AM/FM hardware in smartphones so they could be used to receive emergency broadcasts regardless of cell/data signal.